[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper during boring school hours. This wonderful little piece was starting in boring English class on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, and continued into Art class. It was finished in school on Tuesday, December 2, 2002, when I finished it in English class. I worked on it in no other class, and finished it within a few classes. Hooray for high school.]
The Beginning
If a group of people were to live on an island, who would govern who, how, and why? If person A suspected person B of possessing a deadly weapon (if this were a crime), then how could we justify person A searching person B? Whatever reason offered for justification of search and seizure, it aso justifies person B searching person A. On this island, who would be the government? Who would rule? Whatever can justify the rule of person A can also justify the rule of person B. If one person is elected on the island, through some sort of Republic process, how is he justified in passing and enforcing laws? If an elected ruler passes a law that anyone to wear a hat is killed, would it not be equally justified for one dissident to make their own government, passing legislation that wearing hats is acceptable?
A government may be defined as a person or a persons trying to enforce a rule or regulation. And if one government can be formed by one person, with legislation passed that possessing head fashion is illegal, so another one is not more wrong in making it legal.
By what right would one government have the right to tell one person to do, any more than the one person would have the right to tell what the government to do? Is there anything intrinsically distinctive of either the individual or the government that allows one to control the other without restraint? If this individual opposed the state's regulation as much as the state opposed the individual's actions, how is one more justified in controlling the other? There can be no appeal to one being intrinsically right and one being intrinsically wrong: there have been just as many bad governments as there have been bad rebels. So, if a party of people lived on an island, who would govern who, and how could it possibly be justified?
Take into consideration the lack of justification for government to rule anyone on this island, as for the United States to rule anyone on this land. Just as a government on the island can oppose an individual's actions, so does our United States government oppose some of our actions, as they carry out their regulation. Use of Marijuana, a harmless practice, has been banned by the state. By what writ can the government jail Marijuana users, any more than Marijuana users can enforce their own regulation allowing Marijuana? If a police officer is justified in arresting members of society who do no harm but just commit a crime, then a citizen must be justified in arresting the government equally. There is no divine mandate given to anyone to rule, control, and kill others, be it any populace member or any government.
The similarities between the hypothetical island scenario and the United States government are undeniable. The United States government has no right to rule me any more than I have a right to rule those people who make up the government. Nor ar they justified in any of their legislation, and enforcing their legislation, whether it is outlawing murder, wearing hats, or believing what you want. The government has no right to pass such laws any more than I have the right to pass such laws.
The Middle
The Republic is a type of government where the people vote for one person to rule all. This varies from other types of governments where, more or less, a ruler maintains their power. By maintaining power, I do not mean by campaigning, but rather by an army theratening the populace. Such a ruler may be known as a dictator or a monarch. However, there are some who stipulate that a king's rule is tryanny to the rule of an elected official. What can there be, honestly, to separate the rule of a dictator and the rule of an elected official? Historically, both are prone to commit the most atrocious acts, often defending themselves with the idea that they are defending their land.
Furthermore, both presidents and kings have accepted bribery and corruption. What can there be to separate a Dictatorship and a Republic? It still gives one person, out of thousands, possibly millions, it gives this one person control over the rest of the populace. And whether or not a Constitution exists in this Monarchy or Republic, kings and presidents have both trampled them to pieces in the wake of their search for power and wealth. There is one solitary difference between a dictator and a president: one is elected, one is not. The similarities between these two, though, is endless: their cruel search for power, the history of their relentlessness in eliminating enemies, they rule a population without restrain or control, save the remnants of their conscience.
The United States' administration differs from that of a Latin Dictatorship in one way: how they are chosen. The United States goes through the process of election where we choose our president, but even this failed, as the majority voted against the president who seized power. If there is any proof of corruption of power, of how a president is nothing more than a dictator, then let it be this: our current president was voted against by the people, but he rules us anyway. His laws control our bodies, even though we did not choose him. George W. Bush is not in power because he was elected. He is in power because of his army, because of his secret, underground spy network which keeps tabs on +300 million American suspects. The difference between a Republic and a Dictatorship is election, but both governments give unfair power to one person to rule all people, and both are productive of heartless, cruel atrocities.
The Ending
By what right does a police officer have to detain me, anymore than I have the right to detain the police officer? How isa president more qualified to rule a populace than a dictator? Why is it so impossible to imagine a society that rules itself, with Direct Democracy, and no leaders or police officers?
For Life,
Punkerslut
http://www.punkerslut.com
Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social issues which have caught his attention for several years. His website http://www.punkerslut.com provides a complete list of all of these writings.
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
Excess capacity occurs in many industries, such as power, electricity,... Read More
We need a government that can be as responsive to... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
As pictures and videos surface showing young American soldiers humiliating... Read More
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
The news media will regularly present views from Democratic (liberal),... Read More
SYNOD OF DRUM CEATT (494 - 5):It is interesting to... Read More
Environmentalists say GM Seeds are bad for the environment, dangerous... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
Michael Moore asserts the following in his political film Fahrenheit... Read More
Indonesia's Energy Minister, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, is unhappy with the modest... Read More
The steel tariff taxes a few years ago hurt industry... Read More
In response to Douglas Bower's article; Logic Class 101 Applied... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
Many parents might think it a bit farfetched to compare... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
September 11, 2001 could have been prevented. We could have... Read More
"Fahrenheit 9/11" auteur Michael Moore recently fueled the epidemic of... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
Even the most devout proponents of free marketry and hidden... Read More
Despite their signature on the Biological Weapons Convention of 1975,... Read More
Proposed changes to the Sex Discrimination Act ("SDA") 1975 and... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
We are seeing some trade wars brewing as American trade... Read More
Last Summer the Federal Trade Commission came out with a... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More
Many had made mention of the problems of business opportunities... Read More
With elections on the horizon and Blair looking tired and... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
The recent first round of the Iranian elections somewhat resembled... Read More
The news media will regularly present views from Democratic (liberal),... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
Some people say that we cannot put a colony on... Read More
Yes, Bush is two-faced. The two sides of the faces... Read More
An article in Information Week in January 14, 2002 discussed... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
The resignation from cabinet yesterday, Sunday, by the Israeli minister... Read More
It is widely known in the Homosexual Male Populations that... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
A Governmental commission, headed personally by the Prime Minister has... Read More
Which companies are most affected by fuel? Who really bears... Read More
In 1966, Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of history at... Read More
The recent scathing remarks by High Court Judge Richard Mawrey... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
Rush is right! The government's stepped up bid to regulate... Read More
Let's put it all into perspective: the U.S. has an... Read More
Many are very impressed with the NIMA (National Imagery and... Read More
California Attorneys and politicians are to blame for the energy... Read More
Excess capacity occurs in many industries, such as power, electricity,... Read More
What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
America has some monetary issues, which need to be addressed.... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
The civil war in Iraq seems to be much more... Read More
Journalism, as it is often said, is the 'fourth branch... Read More
Government bodies at any level, local, state, and Federal, can... Read More
Political |