When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
THE ROSICRUCIAN COUNCIL OF THREE:A Thelema/OTO leader who became a... Read More
J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ used to enjoy watching Hoover's... Read More
Which companies are most affected by fuel? Who really bears... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
I am noticing an increasing and alarming rate to which... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
Back-Dooring the CSIS:The US and Israel have admitted they back-doored... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
I was dismayed to learn the other day, that my... Read More
Many environmentalists are against roads through the forest because it... Read More
Well we have certainly been reading a lot about prison... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
It is a law that we register deadly weapons with... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
The more I study the dynamics of WWII the more... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
Sizing up North Korea is important for a war there.... Read More
Sarbaines Oxley was probably the easiest way to destroy free... Read More
Many in the peanut gallery of society are so quick... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
Many of those who wish to fight for our country... Read More
Farmers will eventually be facing federal regulations involving air emissions... Read More
How many legs does a dog have if you call... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
Amnesty International comments on the proposal that has been laid... Read More
The news media will regularly present views from Democratic (liberal),... Read More
PolicyFederal Fair Housing accessibility requirements for new multifamily buildings should... Read More
Rule of Thumb for exporting technology. The American People need... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
While many Pennsylvanians are struggling to figure out how they... Read More
User BaseThe non-US and non-English Web segments have been boosted... Read More
1. United States of America (USA)In the United States, legislation... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
We know that the International Terrorists like the idea of... Read More
It is time for a change. A change in philosophy,... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
In the last two weeks, two non-senior US officials indirectly... Read More
Ok, here is what happened: On March 31, 2005, Pat... Read More
The United States has enemies, which call the country the... Read More
In a move that rocked the online world and left... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
As concerns grow over the threat of bioterrorism and weapons... Read More
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
For years we've suffered under recession, prompting us to ask,... Read More
All the indicators show an improving economy and, finally, the... Read More
Let's make one thing clear: This Dan Nelson Automotive fiasco... Read More
I hear it all the time; you can't say that.... Read More
Most modern day media stories containing fear, controversy and chaos... Read More
In the words of a secret agent who has signed... Read More
The partisan feuding in the U.S. Senate over federal judicial... Read More
Bosnia-Herzegovina (heretofore "Bosnia") is an artificial polity with four, tangentially... Read More
The Flow of Trade is a major consideration of civilizations... Read More
Commission for Africa (CFA), one is made to understand is... Read More
Indonesia's Energy Minister, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, is unhappy with the modest... Read More
I watch the TV news and I get angry. I... Read More
J. Edgar Hoover and LBJ used to enjoy watching Hoover's... Read More
1. Why is it that no one seems to notice,... Read More
"Those who sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety are not... Read More
Elliot Spitzer, recently said he wanted to drive a stake... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
Any chances for a country to be ruled by alternative... Read More
Political |